Cases 1 - 10 of 4,929
FINELLO v. FOSTER WHEELER LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03584
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., AURORA PUMP and others
Plaintiff:
EILEEN BRODERICK, ALFRED C. BRODERICK and ANTHONY FINELLO
Cross Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, CARRIER CORPORATION, JOHN CRANE, INC. and others
Cross Claimant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, CLEAVER BROOKS, TRANE US INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WHERRY v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03376
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. and others
Cross Defendant:
AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, PEP BOYS and others
Cross Claimant:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, 3M COMPANY, PEERLESS PUMP and others
Plaintiff:
GAIL ANN JAKUBAC-WHERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
PINE v. AURORA PUMP et al
as 2:2018cv00927
Cross Claimant:
STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., CARRIER CORPORATION, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant:
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., GEORGIA PACIFIC, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. and others
Cross Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, WARREN PUMPS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LYDIA PINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RICHARDS et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00861
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, GEORGIA PACIFIC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO. and others
Cross Claimant:
AURORA PUMP, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G RICHARDS and GEORGETTA RICHARDS
Cross Defendant:
PEP BOYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
BRADLEY et al v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv02513
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, LLC, AURORA PUMP, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER CO., INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN BRADLEY and KENNETH E. BRADLEY
Cross Claimant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. and A.W. CHESTERTON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Michel v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 2:2018cv04738
Plaintiff:
Victor Anthony Michel, Victor Michel, Keith Michel and others
Defendant:
Honeywell Int. Inc., as Successor in Interest to Bendix Corp., Crane Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Knight et al v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv09421
Defendant:
Viking Pump, Inc., Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Standard Motor Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer E. Knight, Wayne A Knight, Jr., Michael D Knight and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
John Crane Inc
Intervenor Defendant:
Borg Warner Morse TEC LLC, Huntington Ingalls, Inc., Hexion, Inc. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Michael Knight and Debra Knight Houston
3Rd Party Defendant:
McCarty Corporation
Interpleader:
Eagle Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Uniroyal, Inc., Bayer CropScience, Inc., Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
RUSSO et al v. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03024
Defendant:
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., EATON ELECTRICAL, INC., GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK C. RUSSO and HANNAH RUSSO
Counter Defendant:
DOW SILICONES CORPORATION and GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC.
Respondent:
ABB, INC.
Petitioner:
COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Nocelli et al v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01980
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Anna Nocelli, Guido Nocelli and Anna Nocelli
Defendant:
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., Fidelity Capital Inc., Weyerhauser Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Gavin et al v. AGCO Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv02303
Defendant:
Gardner Denver, Inc., Goodyear Tire & Rubber CO., General Refractories Company and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Gavin and Edward Gavin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
