Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Benitez-Dominguez
as 20-1050
Defendant / Appellant:
Cesar Benitez-Dominguez, AKA Chespirio Benitez, AKA Julio Vega
Appellee:
United States of America
Cesar Benitez v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 20-10120
Petitioner / Appellant:
CESAR BENITEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Benitez v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2017cv03095
Petitioner:
Cesar Benitez
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Julio Benitez v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70382
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR BENITEZ
Respondent:
JEFF B. SESSIONS, Attorney General
Benitez v. Livingston et al
as 7:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
Cesar Benitez
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Stephen Williams, Frank Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benitez v. Livingston et al
as 4:2015cv01880
Plaintiff:
Cesar Benitez
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Stephen Williams, Frank Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benitez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutional Division et al
as 4:2015cv01530
Petitioner:
Cesar Benitez
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutional Division, Stephen Williams, Frank Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julio Benitez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71187
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR BENITEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jose Estrada v. Toyota Motor Corporation, et al.
as 2:2008cv05992
Defendant:
Killer Tracks, Invision Entertainment, Cristobal Guervera and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Attorney Settlement Officer
Cross Defendant:
Universal Music MGB NA LLC doing business as Killer Tracks
Plaintiff:
Rene Byron Brizuela a proprietor doing business as Esquavib Music doing business as Brizz Publishing and Jose Estrada
Not Yet Classified:
Universal Music MGB NA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
