Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Garner v. U.S. District Court of Northern Georgia et al
as 2:2020cv01986
Plaintiff:
David Lee Garner
Defendant:
Judge William S. Duffey, Jr., Scarlett Wilson, U.S. Distrtc Court of Chas., S.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Stirling et al
as 2:2015cv02533
Petitioner:
Chas Lamous Smith
Respondent:
Bryan P Stirling , Cecilia Reynolds and South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01353
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shirley Reynolds et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02357
Plaintiff:
Shirley Reynolds , Barbara Wilson , Rosalinda Woods and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Curry v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 2:2013cv02707
Plaintiff:
Jerome Curry
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, Brain Kellett, McDuffie County Dist Atty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. McKeller et al
as 6:2013cv00122
Plaintiff:
Robert Harvie Payne
Defendant:
DFC McKeller, SACDC Chief Administrator, Al Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Payne v. Weissglass et al
as 6:2012cv01929
Plaintiff:
Robert Harvie Payne
Defendant:
Barry Loweissglass , CCOH and Chas Co
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Lucas et al
as 6:2012cv01904
Plaintiff:
Robert Harvie Payne
Defendant:
M Lucas and Chas Co
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Lucas et al
as 6:2012cv01347
Plaintiff:
Robert Harvie Payne
Defendant:
SACDC Lucas and Chas Co
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
