Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Chan v. Abe et al
as 2:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Chik Chan
Defendant:
Atsushi Abe, Alan Campbell, Susan K Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Chan v. Jagdfeld et al
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Joe Chan
Defendant:
Aaron Jagdfeld, Marcia J. Avedon, John D. Bowlin and others
Shumacher v. Leproust et al
as 1:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Leo Shumacher
Defendant:
Emily Leproust, Robert Chess, Nelson C. Chan and others
Nominal Defendant:
Twist Bioscience Corporation
Jim Bishop v. Zhou Min Ni et al
as 2:2020cv10657
Defendant:
HF Foods Group Inc., Zhehui Ni, Ren Hua Zheng and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Bishop and Jesus Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bishop v. Ni et al
as 1:2020cv01103
Defendant:
Zhehui Ni, Ren Hua Zheng, Caixuan Xu and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Bishop
Nominal Defendant:
HF Foods Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chan et al v. Arcsoft, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv05836
Plaintiff:
Lei Liu, Strong Wealth Limited, Marc Chan and others
Defendant:
BEIJING HUATAI NEW INDUSTRY GROWTH INVESTMENT FUND, Timothy Lin, HUATAI UNITED SECURITIES COMPANY LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAN et al v. GORMALLY et al
as 2:2019cv04989
Defendant:
GARY M. RAUCH, RAZA BOKHARI, JOHN J. GORMALLY and others
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY CHAN, JASMINE HENDERSON and DON DANESH WIJESEKERA
Rauenbuehler v. Lee et al
as 1:2014cv09958
Plaintiff:
Ted Rauenbuehler
Defendant:
Alexander Lee, Richard W. Lee, Guohua Sun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cavaliere et al v. Zahn et al
as 1:2014cv09418
Plaintiff:
Francesco Cavaliere
Defendant:
James T. Zahn, Guohua Sun, Yingcang Wei and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DiAntonio, Sr. et al v. Levine et al
as 6:2014cv00718
Plaintiff:
Michael A. DiAntonio, Sr. and Mad Associates, LLC
Defendant:
Lee A. Levine, Alan C. Staller, Arthur E. Sklar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
