Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Barber v. Patznick et al
as 2:2024cv03195
Plaintiff:
Loren Barber
Defendant:
Chance Patznick and City of Newark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Griffith v. Blankenship et al
as 1:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Elisha L. Griffith
Defendant:
Chance Blankenship, Pam Wagner and City of Ironton, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Chance Adams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moyer v. Nanogate North America, LLC
as 1:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Chance Moyer
Defendant:
Nanogate North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Chance Adams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Murphy v. McKnight et al
as 1:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Francis R Murphy
Defendant:
Evan McKnight, Chance Blankenship, Brandon Blankenship and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chance v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02033
Plaintiff:
Janelle Chance
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Last Chance Funding, Inc. v. Tom Agler Livestock, LLC, et al.
as 3:2021cv01090
Defendant:
Agler Livestock Trucking LLC, Tom Agler Livestock, LLC, Sharon Agler and others
Plaintiff:
Last Chance Funding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Decastro v. Wagner et al
as 1:2022cv00204
Petitioner:
Jose Maria Decastro
Defendant:
Pam Wagner, Brad Spoljaric, Chance Blankenship and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Thermo Fisher Scientific Asheville LLC
as 2:2020cv04232
Plaintiff:
Chance Clark
Defendant:
Thermo Fisher Scientific Asheville LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
