Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HAMPTON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Paul Chandler Hampton
Respondent:
State of Georgia and Ralph Shropshire
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler v. Chambers
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Warden Caldwell, Grier and Ms. McAfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. East Central Regional Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Dr. Sarita Sharma, East Central Regional Hospital and Dr. Ajai Kalla
Plaintiff:
Jordan Chandler Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Gay
as 1:2021cv00010
Defendant:
Jaclyn Michelle Gay
Plaintiff:
Sharon Chandler
3Rd Party Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Wilkinson v. FA Vinnen & Co. et al
as 4:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Zim Intergrated Shipping and FA Vinnen & Co.
Plaintiff:
Chandler N. Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Hall et al
as 5:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Nillius, Chandler, Guy Augustin and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Sebastian Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. GoPlus, Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dorlene Chandler
Defendant:
Goplus, Corp. , Wei Wu and Zhejiang Wuyi Shangxin Industrial and Trade Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandler v. Foremost Insurance Company
as 1:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Marvin Chandler
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Thomas v. Suessmith Jr. et al
as 4:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Thomas
Defendant:
Donald C. Suessmith Jr., Chandler, LLC, Household Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
