Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MCLEOD v. DUKES et al
as 7:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
JERRI DUKES, BECKY ROTHROCK, HOWELL L WATKINS II REALTY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. GoPlus, Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dorlene Chandler
Defendant:
Goplus, Corp. , Wei Wu and Zhejiang Wuyi Shangxin Industrial and Trade Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MCLEOD v. INGRAM et al
as 7:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
BILLY INGRAM , BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA , MYRA EXAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cooley v. Buford Board of Education et al
as 1:2015cv03009
Plaintiff:
James Rudolph Cooley
Defendant:
Buford Board of Education, The County of Gwinnett Georgia, City of Buford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Administration for Children Services et al
as 1:2014cv03383
Plaintiff:
Chanel Walker
Defendant:
Administration for Children Services, Claudette Hall, Cassandra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Inniss et al v. Aderhold et al
as 1:2014cv01180
Plaintiff:
Christopher Inniss , Shelton Stroman , Rayshawn Chandler and others
Defendant:
Deborah Aderhold, Brook Davidson and Pinkie Toomer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Suessmith Jr. et al
as 4:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Thomas
Defendant:
Donald C. Suessmith Jr., Chandler, LLC, Household Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
