Cases 21 - 30 of 128
Chandler v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Warden Caldwell, Grier and Ms. McAfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCLEOD v. MALPHUS
as 1:2022cv00132
Consolidated Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
BECKY MALPHUS, BECKEY MALPHUS, CHANDLER GIDDES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Chandler v. Converse et al
as 1:2022cv03359
Plaintiff:
Jakale Errion Chandler
Defendant:
Converse, Crutchfield, Kebo Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McLauren v. P.A.M. Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02265
Plaintiff:
McLaurin Towanna and Towanna McLaurin
Defendant:
P.A.M. Transport, Inc., Keith Chandler Thompson and Keith A. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Robertson v. Chandler Residential et al
as 1:2022cv01931
Plaintiff:
Melanie Robertson
Defendant:
Chandler Residential doing business as Colton Creek Apartments, Jeanna Young and Colton Creek XII LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fowler v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05223
Plaintiff:
Chandler Fowler
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRADDY v. MERRITT et al
as 4:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
RONALD JERMAINE GRADDY
Defendant:
PEYTON MERRITT, CHANDLER BUCHANAN and DERRELL GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01487
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
