Cases 81 - 90 of 129
Inniss et al v. Aderhold et al
as 1:2014cv01180
Plaintiff:
Christopher Inniss , Shelton Stroman , Rayshawn Chandler and others
Defendant:
Deborah Aderhold, Brook Davidson and Pinkie Toomer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kleen products LLC et al v. Packaging Corporation of America et al
as 1:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
Kleen Products LLC, R.P.R. Enterprises, Inc., Mighty Pac, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Packaging Corporation of America, International Paper Company, Cascades Canada, Inc. and others
Movant:
Pratt Industries, Inc.
Kleen products LLC et al v. Packaging Corporation of America et al
as 1:2014mi00008
Plaintiff:
Kleen Products LLC, R.P.R. Enterprises, Inc., Mighty Pac, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Packaging Corporation of America, International Paper Company, Cascades Canada, Inc. and others
Movant:
Pratt Industries, Inc.
Manley et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
Deborah Manley , Brian Manley and Chandler Dobson-Manley
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company , Cooper Tire and Rubber Company and RSP Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandler v. Foremost Insurance Company
as 1:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Marvin Chandler
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Thomas v. Suessmith Jr. et al
as 4:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Thomas
Defendant:
Donald C. Suessmith Jr., Chandler, LLC, Household Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. East Point Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv02063
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wright
Defendant:
East Point Police Department , Clifford Chandler and Quentin Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Widner et al
as 2:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
John Alan Chandler
Defendant:
Jimmie D. Widner , James R. Smith Trucking, Co., Inc. and National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
