Cases 21 - 30 of 196
MURPHY et al v. ALGARIN et al
as 2:2018cv04207
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MAXWELL CHILCOTE, ADAM LOGAL, SHAMARR CHANDLER and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, WARDEN ALGARIN, DEPUTY WARDEN MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER-MILES v. GARBARINO
as 2:2018cv04003
Defendant:
CHARLES GARBARINO
Plaintiff:
KELLY CHANDLER-MILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CHANDLER v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC et al
as 5:2018cv00495
Plaintiff:
NADIR NAIM CHANDLER
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. LUTHER et al
as 2:2017cv05503
Petitioner:
NATHAN CHANDLER
Respondent:
JAMEY LUTHER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA CITY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ACOSTA v. HEART II HEART, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01242
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
HEART II HEART, LLC and TONI CHANDLER DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
BOBO et al v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2017cv03968
Plaintiff:
MADLYNE BOBO , EMA HERNANDEZ , RONALD HUGHES and others
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHANDLER v. L'OREAL USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01141
Plaintiff:
KIM E. CHANDLER
Defendant:
L'OREAL USA, INC. and SOFT SHEEN-CARSON LLC
Mediator:
GARY P. CARUSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MITCHELL v. PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE CHARTER SCHOOL, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv02416
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MITCHELL
Defendant:
PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE CHARTER SCHOOL, INC., HERBERT H. LUSK, II, ROBERT STRAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
