Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LONNY DAVID MATLICK, D.B.A. LONNY D. MATLICK D.O. v. CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC. et al
as 3:2024cv04364
Plaintiff:
LONNY DAVID MATLICK, D.B.A. LONNY D. MATLICK D.O.
Defendant:
CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC., OPTUM, INC. and UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
O'BRADOVICH v. CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OBRADOVICH
Defendant:
CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC., OPTUM, INC. and UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
LUXE DENTAL SPA LLC v. CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04044
Plaintiff:
LUXE DENTAL SPA LLC
Defendant:
CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC., UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED, UNITED HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LUXE DENTAL SPA LLC v. CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC. et al
as 3:2024cv04044
Plaintiff:
LUXE DENTAL SPA LLC
Defendant:
CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC., UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED, UNITED HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
ARTIS v. CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01639
Defendant:
NICHOLAS L KUHAR, PHILLIP M PEAD, BANSI NAGJI and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L ARTIS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
LR Trust v. Change Healthcare Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00500
Defendant:
Nicholas L. Kuhar, Neil E. de Crescenzo, Neil P. Simpkins and others
Plaintiff:
LR Trust
Raagas v. Change Healthcare Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michelle Raagas
Defendant:
Nicholas L. Kuhar, Neil E. De Crescenzo, Bansi Nagji and others
Wilhelm v. Change Healthcare Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00419
Defendant:
Nicholas L. Kuhar, Neil E. De Crescenzo, Bansi Nagji and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv18689
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
