Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Franklin et al v. Cleo AI Inc.
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Shamia Franklin and Devon Chapman
Defendant:
Cleo AI Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Mitchell v. Prince George's County Police et al
as 8:2023cv01275
Plaintiff:
Robert Mitchell
Defendant:
Prince George's County Police, Officer Erik Chapman and Brandon Burroughs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Family of Care Real Estate Holding Co., Inc. et al v. Chapman Property, LLC
as 8:2023cv00574
Counter Defendant:
Family of Care Real Estate Holding Co., Inc. and Charles County Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Chapman Property, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abney et al v. Gomez et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
James D. Abney, Benjamin Acuna, Gonzalo Erick Aguilar-Vargas and others
Defendant:
Christopher Gomez, Federal Correctional Institution McDowell, Colette S. Peters and others
Petitioner:
Antonio Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Federal Tort Claims Act - Disposition by Agency Req
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chapman v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv03136
Plaintiff:
Jamal Chapman
Defendant:
Jeff Nines and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Fisher v. IonQ, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01536
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Fisher
Defendant:
IonQ, Inc., Peter Chapman and Thomas Kramer
Leacock v. IonQ, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Michael Leacock
Defendant:
IonQ, Inc., Peter Chapman and Thomas Kramer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
