Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
French et al v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv10616
Plaintiff:
Richard French and Charlene French
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Latham v. Hurley et al
as 1:2024cv10130
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Tina Hurley, Charlene Bonner, Tonomey Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv12222
Plaintiff:
Charlene McKinney
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 3:2023cv30040
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv10263
Plaintiff:
Charlene Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fuller v. Mici et al
as 1:2021cv10991
Defendant:
Sheila Kelly, Robert Higgins, Massachusetts Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Charlene-Paige Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flynn v. Hannaford et al
as 1:2021cv10012
Defendant:
Charlene Hannaford and Harry Kymissis
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilborn v. Bonner et al
as 1:2019cv12050
Defendant:
Shelia Dupre, Tina Hurley, Tonomey Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wilborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
