Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union (MCOFU) et al v. Mici et al
as 4:2021cv11599
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union (MCOFU), Michael Mosher, Zac Gustafson and others
Defendant:
Carol A. Mici and CHARLES D BAKER
Amicus Curiae:
Prisoners' Legal Services, Dr. Yonatan Grad, Dr. Monik C. Jimnez and others
Moran et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2020cv12171
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Centurion, Helen Brady, Craig Valdez and others
Defendant:
William F. Galvin, Charles D. Baker, Jr. and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey et al v. Baker et al
as 4:2020cv10916
Defendant:
Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Charles D. Baker and Steven M. Sargent
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Casey and Adams Square Baptist Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv10916
Plaintiff:
Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Kristopher Casey and Adams Square Baptist Church
Defendant:
Charles D. Baker and Steven M. Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mass Dynamics, LLC et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv12035
Defendant:
Governor Charles D Baker, Commissioner of DPH Monica Bharel and COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Plaintiff:
Boston Vapor, LLC, Mass Dynamics, LLC, Linda and Jeffrey Vick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head, et al
as 16-1137
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, AQUINNAH/GAY HEAD COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. and AQUINNAH, MA
Defendant - Appellant:
WAMPANOAG TRIBE OF GAY HEAD (AQUINNAH), WAMPANOAG TRIBAL COUNCIL OF GAY HEAD, INC. and AQUINNAH WAMPANOAG GAMING CORPORATION
Defendant:
CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, MAURA T. HEALEY, in her capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and STEPHEN P. CROSBY, in his capacity as Chairman of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
