Cases 1 - 10 of 79
DANIEL v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00871
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DANIEL
Defendant:
ANDREW M SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mirror Finish PDR, LLC et al v. Cosmetic Car Company Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00440
Plaintiff:
Huff Wesley and Mirror Finish PDR, LLC
Defendant:
Eric Stokes, Cosmetic Car Company Holdings, Inc., Cosmetic Car Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Daniels v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv01613
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
COUNCIL v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00470
Petitioner:
WILLIAM H. COUNCIL
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
VERONICA v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00423
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
SOLORIO CAJERO VERONICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HALL v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00176
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
ORLANDO CORDIA HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAYLOR v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00057
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RIGGLEMAN v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00027
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
ELISHA RIGGLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHESTNUT v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00009
Petitioner:
RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHESTNUT v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00016
Petitioner:
RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
