Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56465
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv14260
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. David Grant Medical Center et al
as 3:2018cv04185
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
David Grant Medical Center and U.S. Department of the Air Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Shinseki et al
as 1:2013cv22317
Defendant:
Eric Ken Shinseki and Ray Datiz
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Smith et al v. Five Star Quality Care - NE, LLC
as 4:2013cv03096
Defendant:
Five Star Quality Care - NE, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Five Star Quality Care-NE, LLC
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith and Lorene E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. DePuy Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22642
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Inc. , Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
as 2:2010cv60727
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH JR.
Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH v. THE FLINTKOTE CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv60622
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
THE FLINTKOTE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65827
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH and CHARLES E. SMITH
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65826
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH and CHARLES E. SMITH
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
