Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Penn v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Penn, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Love v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Love
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bender v. State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2022cv00364
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Bender
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Garry L. McFadden
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harrington v. USA
as 7:2020cv00183
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Harrington
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Outer Banks Power Outage Litigation
as 4:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Island Vibe Cafe , Morning Star Stables , TBM Construction and others
Defendant:
PCL Construction Enterprises, Inc. , PCL Civil Constructors, Inc. , PCL Construction Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miss Ocracoke, Inc. et al v. PCL Construction Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Miss Ocracoke, Inc. , Stephen J Wilson , Hatteras Blue, Inc. and others
Defendant:
PCL Construction Enterprises, Inc. , PCL Civil Constructors, Inc. , PCL Construction Resources (U.S.A.), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2017cv00140
Petitioner:
CHARLES EDWARD JOHNSON, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2016cv01109
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CHARLES EDWARD JOHNSON, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Griffith v. USA
as 5:2016cv00133
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Griffith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
