Cases 1 - 10 of 3,646
Cox #095548 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Walter John Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Charles L Ryan, Lori Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faulkner #082417 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01734
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey James Faulkner
Defendant:
David Shinn and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy-Richardson #333262, et al. v. Lewis et al
as 2:2022cv01639
Plaintiff:
Ismael A Murphy-Richardson and Casey Fletcher
Defendant:
Samuel A Lewis, Charles L Ryan, Joan Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Hayes v. Ryan et al
as 2:2022cv00774
Petitioner:
Kasey Markeith Hayes
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romeo #266244 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
James Elliott Romeo
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, David Shinn and Terry Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv02151
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
David Shinn, C Amos, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weber v. Ryan et al
as 2:2021cv02040
Plaintiff:
Cory Brett Weber
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Smith, Terry Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romeo #266244 v. Stewart et al
as 2:2021cv01846
Plaintiff:
James Elliott Romeo
Defendant:
Terry Stewart, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
