Cases 1 - 10 of 38
DINAPOLI et al v. BECERRA et al
as 1:2023cv01799
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DINAPOLI, ANGGIA HAJAR, ARCELIA BROWN and others
Petitioner:
CYNTHIA MORRIS
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHAND HUMAN SERVICES, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, COUNTERMEASURES INJURY COMPENSATION PROGRAM, US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAD SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Moore v. Direct Holdings Americas Inc.
as 2:2019cv14418
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore
Defendant:
Direct Holdings Americas Inc. and Direct Holdings Americas Inc. doing business as Time Life
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Moore v. Debbie Asuncion
as 17-72342
Petitioner:
CHARLES MOORE
Respondent:
DEBBIE ASUNCION, Warden
Moore et al v. Conn Appliances, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01014
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore and Moore Theresa
Defendant:
Conn Appliances, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Raymond Heck, et al v. Kenneth Buhler
as 14-30752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAYMOND E. HECK, DOUG HAMLEY, CHARLES MOORE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WAYNE TRICHE
Raymond Heck, et al v. Kenneth Buhler
as 14-30146
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAYMOND E. HECK, DOUG HAMLEY, CHARLES MOORE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WAYNE TRICHE
Moore v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01477
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Charles Moore
Moore v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01202
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., Transocean, Ltd., Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
