Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Richmond v. Reese, et al.
as 24-1811
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND
Defendant:
MICHAEL REESE, Multnomah County Sheriff, STEVEN ALEXANDER and KURTISS MORRISON
Marshall Richmond v. Michael Reese, et al
as 22-35568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL REESE, Multnomah County Sheriff, STEVEN ALEXANDER and KURTISS MORRISON
Richmond v. Reese et al
as 3:2021cv00866
Defendant:
Kurtiss Morrison, Steven Alexander and Michael Reese
Plaintiff:
Marshall Charles Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv13158
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Charles Richmond Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03123
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Charles Richmond Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Marshall Richmond
as 17-30209
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND
Marshall Richmond v. Richard Ives, et al
as 17-35746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD B. IVES, Warden, BRYAN MARTINEK, KEVIN STRAIGHT and others
USA v. Marshall Richmond
as 17-30076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND, AKA Marshall Charles Richmond III
Marshall Richmond v. Garr King, et al
as 14-35132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND, AKA Marshall C. Richmond, AKA Marshall Charles Richmond, Marshall Charles Richmond, III
Defendant - Appellee:
GARR M. KING, PAUL PAPAK, JENNIFER MARTIN and others
USA v. Marshall Richmond
as 13-30341
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND, AKA Marshall Charles Richmond, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
