Other Personal Injury Cases
Rogers v. Hamilton County, Tennessee, Government et al
as 1:2021cv00220
Plaintiff: Kenneth Charles Rogers
Defendant: Hamilton County, Tennessee, Government, Deputy Nathan Fountain, Deputy Carl Glenn Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Hamilton County, Tennessee, Government et al
as 1:2019cv00019
Defendant: Deputy Mike Mullins, John Doe, Deputy Nathan Fountain and others
Plaintiff: Kenneth Charles Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOWNS-SHEPARD et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2012cv05808
Plaintiff: ADRIENNE DOWNS-SHEPARD , ANTHONY CULLEN , BARBARA STANLEY and others
Defendant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , ABC COS. 1-100, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2012cv03701
Plaintiff: CHRISTINE ROGERS and CHARLES ROGERS, SR.
Defendant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , ABC COS. 1-100, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. WAL-MART Stores, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01024
Plaintiff: Terry Rogers and Charles Rogers
Defendant: WAL-MART Stores, Inc. and WAL-MART Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Charles Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-60622
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee: WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Rogers et al v. Chicago Department of Aviation et al
as 1:2008cv04074
Plaintiff: Beverly Rogers and Charles Rogers
Defendant: Chicago Department of Aviation, UAL Corporation, City of Chicago, The and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01145
Plaintiff: Charles Rogers
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?