Cases 1 - 10 of 14
United States v. Smith
as 20-5006
Defendant / Appellant:
LEE CHARLES SMITH, II
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. SWH Mimi's Cafe, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03624
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith and Charles L. Smith
Defendant:
Cole Geff I, LLC, SWH Mimi's Cafe, LLC and SWH Mimi's Cafe, LLC doing business as Mimi's Cafe 038
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv03157
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States District Court et al
as 5:2019cv03139
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
United States District Court, Larned State Hospital, Justin (lnu) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States District Court
as 5:2019cv03131
Respondent:
United States District Court
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv03104
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Powell et al v. Hall
as 1:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
Robert Powell , Mike Parsons , Warren Trussell and others
Defendant:
Shawn Hall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Barker et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 1:2018cv01161
Plaintiff:
Domitilia Beatrice Ortiz-Valdez, Anthony Reyes, Benny Wilkerson and others
Defendant:
Kidde Fire Fighting, Inc, Kidde PLC, Inc, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Huffman et al v. American Process Piping, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02145
Plaintiff:
Shaun Huffman , Henry Perez , William Harding, IV and others
Defendant:
American Process Piping, Inc., Pamela Graves and Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Cooper v. Anderson et al
as 6:2012cv01070
Plaintiff:
Jerry R. C. Cooper
Defendant:
Vickie Anderson, Cindy Smith, Linda Goeken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
