Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Smith v. Cain et al
as 3:2022cv00650
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Director of Offender Service M.D.O.C., Derrick Chambers and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Keyhe
as 3:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Unknown Keyhe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Windham
as 22-60544
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Lieutenant Unknown Windham and Officer Unknown Green
Smith v. Washington
as 22-60542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Corey Washington, Officer Ground Crew
Smith v. Cain et al
as 3:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Burl Cain, Lieutenant Wten, Mr. Reynolds and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Franks
as 3:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Major Mrs. Dorothy Franks
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Keyhe
as 3:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Unknown Keyhe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Washington
as 22-60185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Corey Washington, Officer Ground Crew
Smith v. Windham et al
as 3:2021cv00613
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Unknown Windham, Sgt. Unknown Tyler, Corr. Officer Unknown Mann and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Michaels et al
as 3:2021cv00553
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Nurse Unknown Michaels, Nurse Unknown Miller, Officer Unknown Robinson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
