Cases 1 - 10 of 11
LUNCEFORD v. GKD Management, LP et al
as 3:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LUNCEFORD
Defendant:
GKD Management, LP, Charles Smith and Prime Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lunceford v. GKD Management, LP et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LUNCEFORD
Defendant:
GKD MANAGEMENT LP, CHARLES SMITH and PRIME INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
LUNCEFORD v. GKD MANAGEMENT LP et al
as 3:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LUNCEFORD
Defendant:
GKD MANAGEMENT LP, CHARLES SMITH and PRIME INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00671
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2019cv00028
Defendant:
Mariah Mitchell, David McBrayer and Georgia Department of Community Supervision
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Floyd County, Ga
as 4:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Sarita Johnson , David Castro , Jason Johnson and others
Defendant:
Floyd County, Ga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
SMITH v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2016cv00480
Plaintiff:
DARRELL CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, CLINTON PERRY, DEXTER SPIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01732
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Abraham et al v. National Football League et al
as 1:2012cv01979
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel D. Abraham , Tunisia Abraham , Hiram Alex and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
