Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith v. Wall et al
as 3:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Lt Wall, Sgt Evans, Cpl Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thigpen v. Davies et al
as 3:2021cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alan Thigpen
Defendant:
Robert E. Lee Davies, William Acree, Don Ash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00382
Defendant:
Judge Charles Smith, State of Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security, Clarksville, Montgomery County Tennessee City Court and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. The Clarksville Montgomery County, Tennessee City Court et al
as 3:2019cv00156
Defendant:
The Clarksville Montgomery County, Tennessee City Court and Judge Charles Smith
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv01155
Movant:
Charles Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv02284
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Adkins, et al. v. Regions Morgan Keegan Select High Income Fund, Inc., et al.
as 2:2013cv02843
Plaintiff:
Gerald Adkins , John Barringer, Earl Bentz and others
Defendant:
Regions Morgan Keegan Select High Income Fund, Inc, RMK High Income Fund, Inc, RMK Strategic Income Fund, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Colbert v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv02752
Plaintiff:
Casey Colbert
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. City of Clarksville Police Department, The et al
as 3:2009cv01058
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Irvin
Defendant:
City of Clarksville Police Department, The, Christ MacMillan, Charles Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
