Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Baylor v. The Florida Klu Klux Klan for the Traditionalist Americans et al
as 6:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gary Baylor
Defendant:
The Florida Klu Klux Klan for the Traditionalist Americans, Charles T. Canady, Ricky Polston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSEN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL D ROSEN
Defendant:
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, HORNORABLE CHARLES T CANADY, HONORABLE JUAN FERNANDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TOWNSEND v. CANADY et al
as 4:2021cv00502
Plaintiff:
RANDALL TOWNSEND
Defendant:
CHARLES T CANADY, JEB BUSH, JOHN GRANT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammond et al v. Canady
as 8:2021cv01658
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Hammond and Patricia J. Hammond
Defendant:
Charles T. Canady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. CANADY et al
as 4:2021cv00163
Defendant:
JOSHUA E DOYLE, FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, ALAN LAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
MADISON B TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gumbs v. Tony et al
as 0:2020cv62384
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Howard Finkelstein, Kevin Michael Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Liston Theodield Gumbs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Lawson et al
as 2:2019cv14060
Defendant:
S. Milliken, Alberto Gonzales, Alan Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Micheal Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Lawson et al
as 2:2019cv14033
Defendant:
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Justice Alan Lawson, Lynretta Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Michael Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMITTE v. WELLS et al
as 4:2018cv00308
Defendant:
KENNETH B BELL, RUTLEDGE P LILES, RICKY POLSTON and others
Plaintiff:
BRUCE COMMITTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
