Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Webb et al v. Wright et al
as 6:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Carol Webb and Katelyn Marie Webb
Defendant:
Traves Charles Wright and Nitrogen Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goeken et al v. Novitas Solutions Inc.
as 4:2020cv04266
Plaintiff:
Charles Wright Deboisblanc and Frances M. Goeken
Defendant:
Novitas Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Goeken v. Novitas Solutions, Inc.
as 4:2020cv04138
Defendant:
Novitas Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frances M Goeken and Charles Wright Deboisblanc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Wright v. Edge
as 5:2017cv00163
Petitioner:
Charles Wright, Jr.
Respondent:
D. Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. United States Of America DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. FILE ONLY IN 4:12-CR-91-1.
as 4:2016cv01729
Petitioner:
Charles Wright
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wright et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03158
Plaintiff:
Charles Wright and Camilla Wright
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. DePuy, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02033
Plaintiff:
Charles Wright
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. City of Garland, Texas et al
as 3:2010cv01852
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Wright
Defendant:
City of Garland, Texas and Chad Stallings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
