Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Dwumaa v. Delaware State University et al
as 1:2025cv01370
Plaintiff:
Denise Dwumaa
Defendant:
Delaware State University, Dr. Tony Allen, Dr. Cherese Winstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Floy (Gilbert)
as 25-2147
Defendant:
HENRY FLOY, SHAKALE BRANTLEY, JOSHUA GILBERT and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Floy (Carter)
as 25-1995
Defendant:
HENRY FLOY, SHAKALE BRANTLEY, LORENZO CARTER and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Floy (Langston)
as 25-1100
Defendant:
JAHAZ LANGSTON, LUIS GARCIA, HENRY FLOY and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Floy (Garcia)
as 25-1006
Defendant:
LUIS GARCIA, HENRY FLOY, SHAKALE BRANTLEY and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Floy (Lockhart)
as 24-1904
Defendant:
JAHAZ LANGSTON, JAUWAN EDWARDS, SHAKALE BRANTLEY and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Floy (Edwards)
as 24-1547
Defendant:
JAUWAN EDWARDS, LUIS GARCIA, HENRY FLOY and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Catholic Health Assoication Santa Ana, CA et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Catholic Health Assoication of the United States of America, Santa Ana, CA, Joel Osteen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Floy (Warren)
as 22-611
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Henry Floy, AKA Mills, Shakale Brantley, AKA Charlie Wilson, AKA Kellz, AKA Man Man, Antoine Sistrink and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Tyiese Warren, AKA Loose Screw, AKA LS KG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
