Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Purple Innovation v. Bedmate-U et al
as 2:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Purple Innovation
Defendant:
Bedmate-U, Chuang Fan Handicraft, Dongguan Bounce Technology and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Zhao v. Ke Zhang Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06452
Defendant:
Jia Yong Zou, Xiang Keng Zhu, Li Hui Zhu and others
Plaintiff:
Piyou Zhao, Zhiqiang Wang and Jin Zhang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rowe v. Yi et al
as 2:2018cv00955
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rowe
Defendant:
Chen Yi and Fjfz
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2015cv05991
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Cartier International A.G., Montblanc-Simplo GmbH and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Chen Mei, et al., A Happy Dreamhost Customer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Sone et al v. Harvest Natural Resources, Inc.
as 4:2013cv02161
Plaintiff:
Kensho Sone , Tseng Ching-Yuan , Wang Shih-Hsine and others
Defendant:
Harvest Natural Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00483
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haiying Xi v. Shengchun Lu, et al
as 08-3322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAIYING XI
Defendant:
SCOF USA INC
Defendant - Non-Participating:
SHENGCHUN LU and CHEN YI YANG
Xi v. Lu, et al
as 08-2803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAIYING XI
Defendant:
SHENGCHUN LU, CHEN YI YANG, LI XIAO LI and others
Chen v. Holder
as 08-60518
Petitioner:
YI XING CHEN, also known as Yi Ling Chen, also known as Xing Chen Yi
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
