Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv01272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Barrett Christopher Biggers v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv02469
Plaintiff:
Barrett Christopher Biggers
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, ZhaoYangJiaJu, MiTu Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
LOMBARDOZZI v. JIANG et al
as 4:2023cv00182
Defendant:
WEOZHONG JIANG, MING CHENG WANG, WEI ZHONG JIANG and others
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE LOMBARDOZZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Tan v. Garland
as 21-6160
Petitioner:
WAI ENG TAN and XIAO CHENG WANG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Srinivasan Venkataraman v. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv08082
Defendant:
Liming Chen, Jerry Lewin, Bing Mei and others
Petitioner:
Tom Brooks and Susan Peck
Plaintiff:
Srinivasan Venkataraman
Srinivasan Venkataraman v. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05171
Defendant:
Liming Chen, Jerry Lewin, Bing Mei and others
Plaintiff:
Srinivasan Venkataraman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
