Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Lancaster v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024ct03150
Plaintiff:
Milton E. Lancaster
Defendant:
Mashell L. Wilson, Timothy L. Lewis, Mr. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jopling v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Cherrie Jopling
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Cherry v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01517
Plaintiff:
Terry Windsor Cherry
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Dubar v. Brody et al
as 7:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Marian Elizabeth Dubar a woman d/b/a Marian Eliabeth Dubar Estate Living 28 Trust
Defendant:
Tao Brody d/b/a Leland One LLC, Edward M. Cherry d/b/a FCA Managemnt LLC, Emily Wingfield d/b/a Loebsack & Brownle, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lentz v. Campbell et al
as 5:2023ct03078
Plaintiff:
Shelby Reid Lentz
Defendant:
Travon Campbell, Aisha Cherry, Hunter Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Butler v. Cherry et al
as 5:2022ct03446
Plaintiff:
Dominique Jamil Butler
Defendant:
Officer Cherry, Officer Demeri, Officer Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Keisha Shanta Cherry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Cureton v. Cherry et al
as 5:2022ct03318
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton
Defendant:
Officer Cherry and Sergeant Lewise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
