Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Richard Bryan v. Terrie Matsen, et al
as 14-35493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD WESLEY BRYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRIE MATSEN, SCCC Mailroom Staff, CHERYL SULLIVAN, SCCC Mailroom Sergeant, KERRI S. MCTARSNEY, SCCC Grievance Coordinator and others
Sullivan v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv06527
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Sullivan
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryan v. Matsen et al
as 3:2014cv05075
Plaintiff:
Richard Wesley Bryan
Defendant:
Terrie Matsen , Cheryl Sullivan , Kerri S McTarsney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richey v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2014cv05050
Plaintiff:
Thomas WilliamSinclair Richey
Defendant:
Cheryl Sullivan and T Matsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cullen Hankerson v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 13-36160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CULLEN M. HANKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BERNIE WARNER, ROBERT MCKENNA and others
Sullivan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-24306
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Sullivan and Troy Sullivan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Sullivan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv24306
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Sullivan and Troy Sullivan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hankerson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv05182
Plaintiff:
Cullen M. Hankerson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Bernie Warner , Robert McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Michael Holmberg v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 12-36001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. HOLMBERG
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, Secretary DOC, DAN PACHOLKE, Deputy Director, PATRICK GLEBE, Superintendent and others
Hegge v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv05795
Plaintiff:
Alvin Hegge
Defendant:
Cheryl Sullivan , United States of America , John Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
