Cases 31 - 40 of 98
The Coalition to Protect Puget, et al v. Taylor Shellfish Company, Inc., et al
as 20-35546
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NISBET OYSTER CO., INC. and TAYLOR SHELLFISH COMPANY, INC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, an agency of the United States of America, TODD T. SEMONITE, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, SCOTT A. SPELLMON, Brigadier General, in his official capacity as Commander of the Northwestern Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE and THE COALITION TO PROTECT PUGET SOUND HABITAT, a non-profit corporation
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35432
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35415
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae:
ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35414
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, STATE OF MONTANA, AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae:
ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35412
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Amicus Curiae:
ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others
United States Sugar Corporation v. Commanding General and Chief of Engineers for the United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 9:2019cv81086
Defendant:
Commanding General and Chief of Engineers for the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Commanding District Engineer for the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321
State of Georgia, et al v. United States Army Corps, et al
as 18-10932
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION and COBB COUNTY-MARIETTA WATER AUTHORITY
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
White Oak Realty, L.L.C., et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 17-30438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WHITE OAK REALTY, L.L.C. and CITRUS REALTY, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS P. BOSTICK, Lieutenant General, United States Army Chief of Engineers, in his official capacity, JOHN W. PEABODY, Major General, Commander, Mississippi Valley Division, United States Army Corps of Engineers, in his official capacity and others
Coastal Conservation League v. US Army Corps of Engineers
as 16-2397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE and SOUTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, LT GENERAL TODD T. SEMONITE, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, LT COLONEL MATTHEW LUZZATTO, in his official capacity as District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District and others
Gulf Coast Rod Reel & Gun Club, et al v. Jerry Patterson, et al
as 16-40181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GULF COAST ROD, REEL AND GUN CLUB, INCORPORATED and GILCHRIST COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, COLONEL CHRISTOPHER W. SALLESE, in his official capacity as District Engineer, Galveston District United States Army Corps of Engineers, LIEUTENANT GENERAL THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Commander and Chief of Engineers, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
