Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Curtis Richardson v. Matt Mahon
as 20-7423
Defendant:
KAREN SHEPHERD, Chief of Police of Loris, SC, individual and official capacity, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CLASSIFICATION SUPERVISOR (NAME UNKNOWN), individual and official capacity, OFFICER JEFF GORE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT MAHON, Loris, SC Policeman, individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS RICHARDSON, a/k/a Curtis D. Richardson, a/k/a Curtis Dale Richardson
Robert Scott v. Marcus McClung
as 20-6284
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, DELEGATE TERRY GENE KILGORE, SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT BRADLEY SCOTT
John Burnley v. Alfred Durham
as 19-1918
Defendant / Appellee:
ALFRED DURHAM, Chief of Police, VERIZON, CITY OF RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN RODGERS BURNLEY
Curtis Richardson v. Matt Mahon
as 19-1909
Defendant:
KAREN SHEPHERD, Chief of Police of Loris, SC, individual and official capacity, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CLASSIFICATION SUPERVISOR (NAME UNKNOWN), individual and official capacity, OFFICER JEFF GORE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT MAHON, Loris, SC Policeman, individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS RICHARDSON, a/k/a Curtis D. Richardson, a/k/a Curtis Dale Richardson
Michael Wirtes v. City of Newport News
as 19-1780
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN WIRTES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS
Defendant:
STACY KELLY, Assistant Chief Kelly (Individual), RICHARD MYERS, Chief of Police (Individual) and NEWPORT NEWS POLICE DEPARTMENT, (Government Agency) Chief of Police
Jerry Welty, Jr. v. Peter Meletis
as 19-7050
Defendant:
AMANDA LAMBERT, Director of Support Services, AUSTIN B. HAYNES, JR., Citizen at Large, PHILLIP CAMPBELL, Assistant fo the County Executive and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE HURLOCK, Director of Security, GLENDELL HILL, Chairman and PETER MELETIS, Superintendent
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY WELTY, JR.
John Dickson, Jr. v. McKinley Price
as 19-1426
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR MCKINLEY L. PRICE, In his individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of State Law, CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA, In its individual capacity as a person, acting under Color of State Law, CITY OF HAMPTON VIRGINIA POLICE TECHNICAL POLICE O JOHN/JANE DOE(S), In their individual capacities, as persons acting under Color of State Law and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
John Dickson, Jr. v. Former FBI Director
as 19-1430
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE DOE JOHNSON, In her individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of State Law, ANNALISA SCHAEPERKOETTER, In her individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of State Law, FBI AGENT MRS./MS. KATHERINE ANDREWS, Former Special Agent in Charge of the Newport News Field office, In her individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of federal and State Law and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Michael Greene v. Kevin Mullis
as 19-6476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE GREENE
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN R. MULLIS, formerly Chief of Police of the Town of Lilesville, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Chief of Police of the Lilesville Police Department at the times relevant to the matters complained of herein and TOWN OF LILESVILLE, NC, an incorporated municipality within the State of North Carolina
Dickson v. U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch, Mr. Eric Holder Former Attorney General of the U.S.A. of Covington & Burling LLP, U.S. Dept of Justice U.S. Attorney Eastern District, Virginia Mr. Dana J. Boente and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
