Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WATSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12912
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHRISTIAN WATSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grant v. Lamont
as 23-1344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eddie Grant, Jr., Jennifer Hamilton, Michael Stiefel and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Edward Lamont, Jr., in his official capacity, James Rovella, in his official capacity, Patrick Griffin, in his official capacity and others
Severino v. Spagnola et al
as 3:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dillon Severino and Dillon Severino
Defendant:
Fernando Spagnola, Ned Lamont, James Rovella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv01223
Plaintiff:
Eddie Grant, Jr., Jennifer Hamilton, Michael Stiefel and others
Defendant:
Edward M. Lamont, Jr., James Rovella, Patrick Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
In re: Damon C. Watson
as 12-80080
Respondent:
In re: DAMON CHRISTIAN WATSON, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: July 1, 1997
In the Matter of Damon Christian Watson - #187886
as 3:2012mc80008
Respondent:
Damon Christian Watson
Frank Johnson, Jr. v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust, et al
as 11-12872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK C. JOHNSON, a.k.a. Frank Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., CHRISTIAN WATSON HANCOCK, Individually, agent of Bradley Arant Boult Cumming Lawfirm, In The State of Florida, JON S. WHEELER, Honorable, Individually and in his capacity as Clerk of Court for the First District of Florida and in his enforcement capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
