Cases 1 - 10 of 4,075
Shull v. Harrell
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shull
Defendant:
Scott Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Temple Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jamall Jenkins
Defendant:
Temple Police Department, Bell County District Attorney and Bell County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Tyroch et al
as 6:2024cv00224
Petitioner:
Christopher Jenkins
Respondent:
Melissa Tyroch and Steve Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans v. DG Trans Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
DG Trans Inc. and Muhammad Javaid Iqbal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Williamson v. Jay Hileman et al
as 4:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Williamson
Defendant:
Jay Hileman, Ryan McConnell and Christopher Petrowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeYoung v. Conner et al
as 4:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Executor Anna DeYoung
Defendant:
James Christopher Conner, Conner and Associates LLC d/b/a Franchise Marketing Systems, Greg Rondinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Vathis v. Brown
as 3:2024cv01030
Petitioner:
Christopher Marcus Vathis
Respondent:
Marion Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Najera v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Christopher Najera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Molina v. Arias et al
as 7:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Herrado Jose Molina
Defendant:
David A. Arias, Sergio Martinez, Sgt. Alyssa D. Gurra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
