Cases 1 - 10 of 13
James v. The State of New York
as 9:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Christopher Emanuel James
Defendant:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. The State of New York et al
as 2:2022cv01404
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. James
Defendant:
The State of New York and Ms. McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Macintosh
as 2:2022cv01120
Petitioner:
Christopher E. James
Respondent:
Ms. Macintosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Upstate Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Christopher Emanuel James and Christopher James
Defendant:
Upstate Correctional Facility, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Upstate Correctional Facility
as 9:2021cv00783
Plaintiff:
Christopher Emanuel James and Christopher James
Defendant:
Upstate Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. State of New York et al
as 3:2021cv00542
Defendant:
Joan E. Mencel, State of New York, Shamise Shidagis and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Emanuel James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Annuci et al
as 6:2020cv06952
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annuci and Paul Piccolo
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. State of New York et al
as 6:2020cv06777
Defendant:
Joan E. Mencel, State of New York, Shamise Shidagis and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Emanuel James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. State of New York et al
as 6:2020cv06718
Defendant:
Ms. SM (Mother) Gould, State of New York, Southport Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Maraj
as 6:2020cv06598
Plaintiff:
Christopher Emanuel James and Briss Stone
Defendant:
Onicka Maraj and Nicki Minaj
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
