Cases 71 - 80 of 437
Paul Valmain v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 13-60799
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL CLARK VALMAIN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN FRANK SHAW and CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cardale Smith v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 13-60747
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARDALE NEILUS SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS and MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Alexander v. Lee et al
as 4:2013cv00245
Plaintiff:
John Peyton Alexander, II
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Robert Sturdivant, Faye Noel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Loden, Jr. v. Christopher Epp
as 13-70033
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS EDWIN LODEN, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Wells v. Shepard et al
as 3:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
Barry Wells
Defendant:
Mark Shepard, Steve Rushing, Pike County Justice Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Epps
as 3:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
Cardale Neilus Smith
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Bailey v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 13-60715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT TITO BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMMITT L. SPARKMAN, Deputy Commissioner, BERTHA SPIVEY, STG Coordinator and others
Peter McGovern v. MS Department of Correction
as 13-60696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER THOMAS MCGOVERN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS
Spicer v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00377
Plaintiff:
Fred Sanford Spicer, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darryl Mixon v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 13-60619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RONALD KING, Superintendant, J. KIRKWOOD, Mailroom Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
