Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bell v. Lyft, Inc.,
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bell
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Not Used
as 2:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bell
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Daniel Garcia v. City of Santa Clara, et al
as 17-16883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL CARLOS GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA CLARA, STEPHEN LODGE, Chief of Police, GARY HOSMAN and others
Wayne Stewart v. USDC-CALA
as 14-72670
:
In re: WAYNE SCOTT STEWART
Petitioner:
WAYNE SCOTT STEWART
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
E. VILLANUEVA, Correctional Officer, ISAAC MIJARES, Correctional Lieutenant, JAMES VARELA, Program Sergeant and others
Wayne Stewart v. E. Villanueva et al
as 2:2014cv02895
Defendant:
Veanie Adams, Lonte Allen, Christopher Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Stewart
Christopher Bell v. Captain Godwin et al
as 5:2014cv00367
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bell
Defendant:
Captain Godwin and Sis Jensen
Jason Mun v. Julie Spector, et al
as 13-35374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON CHAE MUN
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE A. SPECTOR, in her individual capacity, RONALD KESSLER, in his individual capacity and CHRISTOPHER BELL, in his official and individual capacity
Mun v. Spector et al
as 2:2013cv00486
Plaintiff:
Jason Chae Mun
Defendant:
Julie Spector , Ronald Kessler and Christopher Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cintas Corporation v. Andrews et al
as 3:2006cv05107
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Joe Andrews, Mitchell Aron Beard , Melvin Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Cintas Corp. Overtime Pay Arbitration Litigation
as 3:2006md01781
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation
Defendant:
Robert J. Abel, David J. Abrahamsen, Nicholas Ackerman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
