Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bryan v. Apple Inc.
as 4:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryan
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hin v. U.S. Dept. of Justice U.S. Marshals, et al.,
as 2:2021cv00393
Defendant:
Adam Groff, Christopher Bryan Slate, County of San Joaquin and others
Plaintiff:
Sokcheath Hin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ratliff v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01284
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc. and Google LLC
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryan Ratliff, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Christopher Bryan McKenzie v. Rosemary Ndoh
as 8:2018cv02303
Respondent:
Rosemary Ndoh
Petitioner:
Christopher Bryan McKenzie, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ablett v. USA
as 3:2015cv04570
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Bryan Ablett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Anaeme et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv02555
Defendant:
Mr Acevado, Y Adiboye, S Afhook and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01140
Defendant:
Mr Acevado, Mr Acevado, David Ackerschott and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
