Cases 61 - 70 of 120
Roger Thorson v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 11-60541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER ERIC THORSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman and JIM HOOD
James Winding v. Robert Grubbs, et al
as 11-60442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. WINDING
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT GRUBBS, O. MILLER, WILLIE BOOKERT and others
James Jones v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 11-60439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, E. L. SPARKMAN and DAVID PETRIE
James Jones v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 11-60437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, E. L. SPARKMAN and DAVID PETRIE
Melvin Gamage v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 11-60388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN GAMAGE
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC, GLORIA PERRY, sued in her individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, sued in his individual capacity and others
Paul Evans v. David Petrie, et al
as 11-60209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PETRIE, DEBRA PLATT, RONALD KING and others
James Rowsey v. Regina Hancock, et al
as 11-60182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT ROWSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
REGINA HANCOCK, Warden, RONALD KING and CHRISTOPHER EPPS
Richard Lawler v. MS Department of Corrections, et al
as 10-60975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DONALD LAWLER
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LUTHER THAXTON, Individually and in his official capacity and CHRISTOPHER EPPS
Tony Reynolds v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 10-60681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY KEITH REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner, RUFUS BURKS and BRIAN LADNER, Associate Warden
James Stern v. Christopher Epp
as 10-60662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H STERN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
