Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Farmer v. Forbis et al
as 2:2025cv00156
Plaintiff:
Calip Joseph Farmer
Defendant:
Christopher Forbis, NFN Duke and NFN Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Forbis
as 25-10466
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Respondent:
Christopher Forbis, Sheriff and Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garcia v. Forbis et al
as 2:2025cv00065
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant:
Christopher Forbis, NFN Townsend and Randall County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Garcia v. Forbis
as 5:2025cv00017
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Respondent:
Christopher Forbis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garcia v. Kacsmaryk
as 24-10774
Respondent:
Matthew Joseph Kacsmaryk, District Judge, United States Marshal, Lee Ann Reno, Magistrate Judge and others
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Nall v. Fowler et al
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Don Evan Nall
Defendant:
Misty Kae Pagett Arreano, Ken Paxton, Tracy Lashell Nall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Randall County Jail
as 24-10638
Defendant:
Randall Co. Medical Service, Randall County Jail, Amarillo Texas United States Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Garcia v. Kacsmaryk et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Respondent:
Lee Ann Reno, Matthew J Kacsmaryk, Christopher Forbis and others
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garcia v. Randall County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant:
Christopher Forbis, Amarillo Texas US Marshall Service, Randall Co Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Forbis et al
as 2:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant:
Christopher Forbis, Randall County Jail Medical Department, NFN Lacey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
