Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Travis Harvey v. United States
as 23-3172
Petitioner: Travis Christopher Harvey
Respondent: United States of America
Doe et al v. Lyft Drives Connecticut, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff: Jane Doe, Joan Doe and John Doe
Defendant: Lyft Drives Connecticut, Inc. and Christopher Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe et al v. Lyft Drives Connecticut, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00531
Plaintiff: Jane Doe, Joan Doe and John Doe
Defendant: Lyft Drives Connecticut, Inc. and Christopher Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HARVEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05923
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER HARVEY
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Travis Harvey v. United States
as 21-3265
Petitioner / Appellant: Travis Christopher Harvey
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Harvey v. USA
as 8:2021cv00316
Petitioner: Travis Christopher Harvey
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Travis Harvey We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2350
Defendant / Appellant: Travis Christopher Harvey
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
HARVEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40664
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARVEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38062
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARVEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv83560
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?