Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wall, et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2018cv00951
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson, James Graham, Michael Johnson and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Johnson v. John Montford Unit Offender
as 5:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
John Montford Unit Offender and Adrian Navarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Harris County et al
as 4:2016cv01623
Defendant:
Harris County, Gerrit Quellhorst, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00929
Petitioner:
Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2016cv00081
Petitioner:
Brandon Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Warden Chapdelaine
as 3:2015cv03394
Petitioner:
Brandon Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Chapdelaine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reynolds et al v. Cactus Drilling Company LLC et al
as 7:2015cv00101
Defendant:
Cactus Drilling Company LLC and Personal Representative of the Estate of Christopher Johnson
Plaintiff:
David Reynolds and Rosemary Reynolds
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Joshua Trevino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Johnson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson and Rhonda Johnson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Johnson V Travis, et al
as 4:2014cv00272
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Will Travis, Michael Ganzer, G Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
