Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
City of San Diego and Alternate Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Jones v. Hunt et al
as 3:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Nurse Hunt, Dr Hicks, Ely State Prison Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. DSP Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv08743
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
DSP Group, Inc., Shira Fayans Birenbaum, Ofer Elyakim and others
Hooper et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv04283
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Treitner, Cory M. Bynum, Dwayne Smith and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. County of San Diego
as 3:2021cv00847
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
County of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Christopher Jones et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 5:2019cv01341
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Jones and Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-16097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abdul Mohamed, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 18-16097
Appellant:
STEVEN SIDLER, DANIEL TURNER, HAROLD BROWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHANNON WISE, RONALD GILLETTE, BRANDON FARMER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Christopher Jones v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv04303
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
