Cases 1 - 10 of 572
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Harris v. Neal et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Harris
Defendant:
Monique Neal, Jocelyn Cooney, Jaymie Parkhurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Williams et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 1:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS and LEISHA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 RESPA: Servicing of Mortgage Loans
Harris v. Perez, et al.
as 24-955
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant:
JOSE PEREZ, JOHN/JANE DOE, Arresting Officer, Tulalip Police Department, JOHN/JANE DOE 1, Back up Officer, Tulalip Police Department and others
Harris v. Combs, et al.
as 24-588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA COMBS, US Probation, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Prosecuting Attorney Overseeing Case No. CR-23-019-RAJ and JULIE JANSEN, Location Monitor Specialist
Harris v. American Behavioral Health System, et al.
as 24-347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM, Inpatient Facility, DONYES, Ms., Drug Counselor - SUDP ABHS, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
