Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Michele D Burke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00521
Defendant:
Laureate Institute, Tulsa County, Ryan Braschler and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cox v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2019cv00483
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, The, City of Tulsa, Jenny Remy and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Jane Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wade v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2019cv00158
Defendant:
Internal Affairs, Chuck Jordan, G T Bynum and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Boydston et al v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2018cv00454
Defendant:
David L Flanagan, K Kuerbitz, City of Tulsa and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Boydston and Cathryn Boydston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Reid et al
as 4:2018cv00374
Defendant:
Keith C Reid, Don Newberry, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Silas Wilson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Reid et al
as 5:2018cv00587
Plaintiff:
Silas Wilson, Jr
Defendant:
Keith C Reid, Chuck Jordan, G T Bynum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
Brande L Samuels
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Bar Association City of Tulsa, Tulsa County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Fossen v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
John Van Fossen
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Jennifer Murphy, Michael Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2015cv00522
Plaintiff:
Janice Martin
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Chuck Jordan, CPL. Francetic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
