Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Eidos Display, LLC et al v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd.
as 6:2017cv00349
Plaintiff:
Eidos Display, LLC and Eidos III, LLC
Defendant:
Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd.
Mediator:
James W. Knowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anvik Corporation v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. et al
as 3:2011cv02203
Plaintiff:
Anvik Corporation
Defendant:
Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. , Tatung Company and Tatung Company Of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Positive Technologies Inc. v. Sony Electronics Inc et al
as 3:2011cv02226
Plaintiff:
Positive Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Sony Electronics Inc , Hewlett-Packard Company , ACER America Corporation and others
Intervenor:
Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 6:2011cv00201
Plaintiff:
Eidos Display, LLC and Eidos III, LLC
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America , Chi Mei Innolux Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Honeywell International Inc et al v. Acer America Corporation et al
as 6:2007cv00125
Plaintiff:
Honeywell International Inc, Honeywell International Inc, Honeywell International Inc and others
Defendant:
Acer America Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America and others
Counter Claimant:
BenQ USA Corp, Novatek Microelectronics Corp LTD, Acer America Corporation and others
Counter Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Anvik Corporation v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. et al
as 7:2007cv00820
Plaintiff:
Anvik Corporation, Anvik Corporation, Anvik Corporation and others
Defendant:
Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., Tatung Company, Tatung Company Of America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
