Cases 71 - 80 of 241
CiFuentes et al v. 7905 Tavern Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00994
Plaintiff:
Calixto Espinal, Ana Maria Pulido and Carlos CiFuentes
Defendant:
7905 Tavern Corp., Hernan Rejas and 7905 Tavern Corp. doing business as Melao
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
McClain et al v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2018cv11836
Defendant:
"FNU" Kats, Richard Roes, John Freisen and others
Plaintiff:
Kamiesha McClain and Trina McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cifuentes v. Sexy Lovely World Corp et al
as 1:2018cv24901
Defendant:
Juan Rafael Calderon, Sexy Lovely World Corp and Katherine Calderon
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Cifuentes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
DEGIRONIMO et al v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv14594
Defendant:
ERNEST RIVERA, MICHAEL A. PAPAGNI, JOHN DOE 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
DIANA CIFUENTES and VITO DEGIRONIMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Julieta Figueroa-Alva, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-72436
Petitioner:
JULIETA ARANZAZU FIGUEROA-ALVA, BEBERLY CIFUENTES-FIGUEROA and ZARETH CIFUENTES-FIGUEROA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Jose Cifuentes-Ixcoy v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-72387
Petitioner:
JOSE CIFUENTES-IXCOY
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
USA v. Jorge Cifuentes-Cuero
as 18-13327
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE ELIECER CIFUENTES-CUERO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Cifuentes v. United States of America
as 8:2018cv01845
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Ever Solis Cifuentes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Raul Cotill-Cifuentes v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71852
Petitioner:
RAUL RODRIGO COTILL-CIFUENTES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
