Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Harmon, Jr v. Williams et al
as 6:2019cv00035
Defendant:
Doug Williams, Cindy L. Smith, Gregory C. Dozier and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Jenkins Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00126
Defendant:
WARDEN SECRETARY TENAKA BROWN, LISA FOUNTAIN, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. Hall et al
as 5:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Nillius, Assistant Warden Ricky Stone, Malcolm Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonon v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Cindy L. Smith, Doctor Cheney, Phil Hall and others
Plaintiff:
China Lonon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Roberts et al
as 1:2018cv00197
Defendant:
Mrs. Lisa Mayo, Mrs. Rita K. Lomio, Mr. Stan Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv07702
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. f/k/a Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Ltd., Sun Pharma Global FZE, Actavis LLC f/k/a Actavis Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cindy L Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Allen et al
as 6:2018cv00081
Defendant:
Marty Allen, Lt. Byron, Sgt Heward and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jacob Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2018cv00245
Defendant:
CHIEF COUNSELOR STREETER, BRUCE CHATMAN, MEDICAL DIRECTOR SHARON LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Warden Jack Koon, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Lisa Fountain and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Tomasko et al
as 3:2018cv00944
Plaintiff:
Alan C. Smith and Cindy L. Smith
Defendant:
Marshelle C. Tomasko , David Tomasko and Sherry M. Tomasko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
